Recently flickr (Yahoo's popular photo sharing site) has announced the availability to host video which you can upload a 90sec or 150Mb clip of video. This sounds like value added service and good for consumer.
However, this doesn't seems to be the case. There are some users who protest on this http://www.flickr.com/groups/no_video and http://www.flickr.com/groups/no_video_on_flickr/ as they thinks that flickr is for photographers and should have only photo. In contrary, I see video as a collection of photos run in a sequenced manner with audio.
But then I suppose a photographer doesn't click with a videographer, do they ? :)